Back to Course

Professional Responsibility and Ethics (LAW 747)

0% Complete
0/361 Steps
  1. Course Overview & Materials
    Syllabus - LAW 747
    5 Topics
  2. Topics
    1. Introduction & Background
    10 Topics
  3. 2. Admission to the Practice of Law
    8 Topics
  4. 3. Introduction to the Standard and Process of Lawyer Discipline
    17 Topics
  5. 4. Malpractice
    21 Topics
  6. 5. Unauthorized Practice of Law
    16 Topics
  7. 6. Duty to Work for No Compensation (Pro Bono)
    13 Topics
  8. 7. Decision to Undertake, Decline, and Withdraw from Representation; The Prospective Client
    15 Topics
  9. 8. Division of Decisional Authority Between Lawyer and Client
    7 Topics
  10. 9. Competence, Diligence, and Communication
    8 Topics
  11. 10. Duty of Confidentiality: Attorney-Client Privilege and Work Product Doctrine
    18 Topics
  12. 11. Duty of Confidentiality: Rule 1.6 and its exceptions
    22 Topics
  13. 12. Advising Clients – Both Individual and Corporate
    12 Topics
  14. 13. Conflict of Interest: Concurrent Client Conflict
    19 Topics
  15. 14. Conflict of Interest: Conflicts Between A Client and the Lawyer’s Personal Interest
    9 Topics
  16. 15. Conflict of Interest: Former Clients
    13 Topics
  17. 16. Communication Between Lawyers and Represented/ Unrepresented Persons
    7 Topics
  18. 17. Billing for Legal Services: Fees, Handling Client Property (Settlement Proceeds and Physical Evidence)
    19 Topics
  19. 18. The Decision to File/Prosecute a Claim; Litigation & Negotiation Tactics
    14 Topics
  20. 19. Lawyer’s Duties to the Tribunal
    10 Topics
  21. 20. Duties of a Prosecutor; Limits on Trial Publicity
    12 Topics
  22. 21. Solicitation & Marketing: Constitutional & Ethical Issues
    18 Topics
  23. 22. Law Firm Administration Issues
    8 Topics
  24. 23. Judicial Ethics
    35 Topics
  25. Course Wrap-Up
    What Did We Learn?
Lesson Progress
0% Complete

It is a fundamental tenet of judging that a judge should be impartial and should not be engaged in actity that would lead litigants or the public to believe that the judge is biased or can not neutrally reach a decision.  One reason that a litigant (or the public) could believe that a judge is biased is if the judge is actively engaged in political activity.  If judges were allowed to be politically active, the public could believe that the judge would be influenced by political considerations in their decisions.[1]  Therefore, Rule 4.1 essentially prohibits all political activity except voting – a judge may register with a political party (e.g. Republicans/Democrats) and vote. 

A judge cannot be involved in a political organization (holding office or soliting funds for).  The judge also cannot make speeches on behalf of a political organization or attend or purchase tickets for dinners or other events sponsored by a political organization or a candidate for office.  A judge also cannot publicly identify themselves as the candidate of a political organization or seek/accept/use an endorsement from a political organization.  The concern is that the judge could be perceived as making decisions based on political influence.  Furthermore, a judge cannot publicly endorse/oppose or raise money for a candidate for public office – this extends even to members of the judge’s family that may be running for office.  The concern is that it could be perceived that the judge is using the prestige of her office to advance the interests of the political organization or candidate.[2] A judge is also prohibited from making any statements that would reasonably be expected to affect the outcome for fairness of a pending or impending matter in any court.[3]  A judge is also prohibited from making “pledges, promises, or commitments that are inconsistent with the impartial performance of the adjudicative duties of judicial office.”[4]


[1] ABA Code of Judicial Conduct, Canon 4, Rule 4.1, Comment [3].

[2] ABA Code of Judicial Conduct, Canon 4, Rule 4.1(A)(1)-(3), Comments [4] & [5].

[3] ABA Code of Judicial Conduct, Canon 4, Rule 4.1(A)(12).

[4] ABA Code of Judicial Conduct, Canon 4, Rule 4.1(A)(11-13).