Back to Course

Professional Responsibility and Ethics (LAW 747)

0% Complete
0/361 Steps
  1. Course Overview & Materials
    Syllabus - LAW 747
    5 Topics
  2. Topics
    1. Introduction & Background
    10 Topics
  3. 2. Admission to the Practice of Law
    8 Topics
  4. 3. Introduction to the Standard and Process of Lawyer Discipline
    17 Topics
  5. 4. Malpractice
    21 Topics
  6. 5. Unauthorized Practice of Law
    16 Topics
  7. 6. Duty to Work for No Compensation (Pro Bono)
    13 Topics
  8. 7. Decision to Undertake, Decline, and Withdraw from Representation; The Prospective Client
    15 Topics
  9. 8. Division of Decisional Authority Between Lawyer and Client
    7 Topics
  10. 9. Competence, Diligence, and Communication
    8 Topics
  11. 10. Duty of Confidentiality: Attorney-Client Privilege and Work Product Doctrine
    18 Topics
  12. 11. Duty of Confidentiality: Rule 1.6 and its exceptions
    22 Topics
  13. 12. Advising Clients – Both Individual and Corporate
    12 Topics
  14. 13. Conflict of Interest: Concurrent Client Conflict
    19 Topics
  15. 14. Conflict of Interest: Conflicts Between A Client and the Lawyer’s Personal Interest
    9 Topics
  16. 15. Conflict of Interest: Former Clients
    13 Topics
  17. 16. Communication Between Lawyers and Represented/ Unrepresented Persons
    7 Topics
  18. 17. Billing for Legal Services: Fees, Handling Client Property (Settlement Proceeds and Physical Evidence)
    19 Topics
  19. 18. The Decision to File/Prosecute a Claim; Litigation & Negotiation Tactics
    14 Topics
  20. 19. Lawyer’s Duties to the Tribunal
    10 Topics
  21. 20. Duties of a Prosecutor; Limits on Trial Publicity
    12 Topics
  22. 21. Solicitation & Marketing: Constitutional & Ethical Issues
    18 Topics
  23. 22. Law Firm Administration Issues
    8 Topics
  24. 23. Judicial Ethics
    35 Topics
  25. Course Wrap-Up
    What Did We Learn?
Lesson 24, Topic 7
In Progress

23.07. Ensure that all parties have a right to be heard

Lesson Progress
0% Complete

A judge must give every person who is properly before the court a right to be heard as required by law. One area where judges can potentially undermine a party’s right to be heard is the settlement context.  A judge who acts in a manner that makes parties feel like they are being coerced into settlement can undermine the right to be heard.  Therefore, while a judge can “encourage” settlement – the judge should not coerce settlement.[1]

When a judge does engage in settlement negotiations, it can impact the judge’s perception of the parties.  For example, the judge may influence the judge’s perception of the case or create a bias toward/against a party based on what is learned in the course of settlement if it is not successful.  These interactions could compromise a judge’s impartiality (or at the very least the appearance of impartiality) and require disqualification.  A judge should carefully consider whether to participate in settlement negotiations at all, and take into account:  (i) whether the parties have requested/consented to judicial involvement; (ii) whether the parties/counsel are sophisticated; (iii) whether the case will be tried to a judge or jury if the settlement is unsuccessful; (iv) whether the parties participate with counsel in the settlement negotiations; (v) whether there are any unrepresented parties participating; and (vi) whether the matter is civil or criminal.[2]


[1] ABA Code of Judicial Conduct, Canon 2, Rule 2.6(B).

[2] ABA Code of Judicial Conduct, Canon 2, Rule 2.6, Comment [2].